Some manufacturers see no direct threat in PUA, which is why they also do not classify them as dangerous. This includes tools with lots of advertising, ambiguous messages or even strange privacy statements. While these programs do not cause any damage, they do exhibit peculiar behavior. In a second non-rated supplemental test, it was determined how well the solutions detected so-called 'potentially unwanted applications' – or PUA for short. Regarding corporate solutions, the packages from Bitdefender, McAfee and Sophos reached similar high results. Among the consumer packages from Bitdefender, Kaspersky Lab and Trend Micro, the rate was nearly 100 percent. That is why the laboratory tested the detection of Windows malware samples in a non-rated supplemental test. In everyday scenarios, many protection packages run in mixed networks and exchange data with Windows.

The endpoint packages McAfee and SentinelOne followed close behind with 99.8 and 99 percent detection.

With respect to solutions for business users, Bitdefender and Sophos managed to achieve the 100 percent mark. Only Avira and F-Secure had minor detection problems. In the case of the products for home users, 6 out of 8 packages tested detected 100 percent of the malware samples. In the test, each solution was required to detect, block or delete more than 500 of the very latest attackers. In the category of corporate solutions, the products from Bitdefender, McAfee and SentinelOne attained the best result. The products for consumer users from Bitdefender, Intego, Symantec and Trend Micro achieved this score. In each category, the laboratory awards a maximum of 6 points. The products were evaluated in terms of their protection, performance and usability. All security packages were examined on identical iMacs running MacOS High Sierra 10.13.3.

Best mac malware removal os sierra